‘Green card for the planet’? Fifa’s World Cup is on pace to be a climate catastrophe

A Toxic Legacy: The 2026 World Cup and the Climate Price of Football’s Global Ambition

Soccer fans the world over are eagerly anticipating the 2026 World Cup in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The tournament promises to be a spectacular showcase of human achievement and global unity, with millions of spectators and billions of viewers worldwide. Yet, beneath the surface of this grand spectacle lies a stark reality: the 2026 World Cup is on pace to be an unmitigated climate catastrophe.

The environmental footprint of the tournament is staggering, with projected greenhouse gas emissions of nearly 9m tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. This figure is nearly double the historical average, and represents a significant escalation of the problem. Air travel, which accounts for approximately 7.7m tons of the carbon budget, is the primary driver of this increase. In comparison, the average emissions of tournaments held between 2010 and 2022 were a fraction of this amount. The worst-case scenario for air transport emissions is a chilling 13.7m tons of CO2, a prospect that scientists warn could have devastating consequences for the planet.

The World Cup’s environmental record has been a subject of controversy for years, with each successive tournament failing to meet its environmental promises. The 2022 World Cup in Qatar was widely criticized for its reliance on air conditioning, which consumed an estimated 10% of the country’s electricity. The tournament’s organizers had promised to offset these emissions through carbon credits, but critics argued that this was little more than a public relations gimmick.

The 2026 World Cup faces an even more daunting challenge, with the added complication of hosting countries with diverse environmental profiles. The United States, for example, is one of the world’s largest emitters of greenhouse gases, while Mexico and Canada have made significant strides in reducing their carbon footprint. The tournament’s organizers have pledged to achieve net-zero emissions, but the details of how they plan to achieve this goal remain sketchy.

One of the most pressing concerns is the impact of air travel on the tournament’s carbon budget. The sheer scale of international travel required to stage the World Cup is unprecedented, with millions of fans and officials expected to crisscross the globe. The emissions generated by air travel are a major contributor to climate change, and the World Cup’s reliance on this mode of transportation is a significant concern. In the absence of a comprehensive plan to reduce emissions from air travel, the 2026 World Cup is likely to be one of the most polluting major sporting events in history.

The World Cup’s environmental impact is not just a matter of abstract numbers and statistics; it has real-world consequences for the most vulnerable communities. Rising temperatures and more frequent extreme weather events are already taking a devastating toll on small island nations and low-lying coastal communities. The World Cup’s carbon footprint will only serve to exacerbate this problem, contributing to a global climate crisis that threatens the very survival of our planet.

As the 2026 World Cup approaches, there is a growing sense of unease among environmentalists and climate activists. The tournament’s organizers have been criticized for their lack of transparency and accountability on environmental issues, and the public remains largely unaware of the true scale of the problem. The clock is ticking, and the world is running out of time to take action. Will the 2026 World Cup be a “green card” for the planet, or a catastrophic mistake that we will come to regret for generations to come?

In response to the growing criticism, the tournament’s organizers have announced a series of initiatives aimed at reducing emissions and promoting sustainability. These include investments in renewable energy, measures to reduce energy consumption, and a new carbon offsetting program. While these efforts are welcome, they are unlikely to be enough to offset the tournament’s massive carbon footprint. The 2026 World Cup is a stark reminder of the contradictions and challenges of globalized sports, where the pursuit of glory and spectacle often takes precedence over environmental and social responsibility.

As the world watches the 2026 World Cup unfold, it will be important to keep a close eye on the tournament’s environmental performance. Will the organizers be able to meet their promises, or will the event become a symbol of the world’s failure to take action on climate change? The world is watching, and the consequences of this tournament will be felt for generations to come.

Written by

Veridus Editorial

Editorial Team

Veridus is an independent publication covering Africa's ideas, politics, and future.